ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025
Predicting treatment retention in medication for opioid use disorder: a machine learning approach using NLP and LLM-derived clinical features.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Integrating Psychosocial Factors into Artificial Intelligence Models for Predicting Addiction Treatment Outcomes: A Systematic Review.European addiction research · 2026Pooled it
- A wearable acoustofluidic patch for rapid reversal of opioid overdose.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Natural language processing to enhance rheumatoid arthritis care in clinical studies: a scoping review of applications, data, approaches, challenges and future directions.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveBuilding upon our previous work on predicting treatment retention in medications for opioid use disorder, we aimed to improve 6-month retention prediction in buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NAL) therapy by incorporating features derived from large language models (LLMs) applied to unstructured clinical notes. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe used de-identified electronic health record (EHR) data from Stanford Health Care (STARR) for model development and internal validation, and the NeuroBlu behavioral health database for external validation. Structured features were supplemented with 13 clinical and psychosocial features extracted from free-text notes using the CLinical Entity Augmented Retrieval pipeline, which combines named entity recognition with LLM-based classification to provide contextual interpretation. We trained classification (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost) and survival models (CoxPH, Random Survival Forest, Survival XGBoost), evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic-Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) and C-index.
resultsXGBoost achieved the highest classification performance (ROC-AUC = 0.65). Incorporating LLM-derived features improved model performance across all architectures, with the largest gains observed in simpler models such as Logistic Regression. In time-to-event analysis, Random Survival Forest and Survival XGBoost reached the highest C-index (≈0.65). SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis identified LLM-extracted features like Chronic Pain, Liver Disease, and Major Depression as key predictors. We also developed an interactive web tool for real-time clinical use. DISCUSSION: Features extracted using NLP and LLM-assisted methods improved model accuracy and interpretability, revealing valuable psychosocial risks not captured in structured EHRs.
conclusionCombining structured EHR data with LLM-extracted features moderately improves BUP-NAL retention prediction, enabling personalized risk stratification and advancing AI-driven care for substance use disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.