Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40977267›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025

A survey on deep learning for drug-target binding prediction: models, benchmarks, evaluation, and case studies.

Kusal Debnath, Pratip Rana, Preetam Ghosh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Adaptive Self-Attention Graph Pooling for Drug-Target Affinity Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Drug-Target Interaction Prediction with PIGLET.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kusal DebnathDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, United States.
Pratip RanaDepartment of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, United States.
Preetam GhoshDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional drug discovery is expensive, time-consuming, and prone to failure. Artificial intelligence has become a potent substitute over the last decade, providing strong answers to challenging biological issues in this field. Among these difficulties, drug-target binding (DTB) is a key component of drug discovery techniques. In this context, drug-target affinity and drug-target interaction are complementary and essential frameworks that work together to improve our comprehension of DTB dynamics. In this work, we thoroughly analyze the most recent deep learning models, popular benchmark datasets, and assessment metrics for DTB prediction. We look at the paradigm shift in the development of drug discovery research since researchers started using deep learning as a potent tool for DTB prediction. In particular, we examine how methodologies have evolved, starting with early heterogeneous network-based approaches, progressing to graph-based approaches that were widely accepted, followed by modern attention-based architectures, and finally, the most recent multimodal approaches. We also provide case studies utilizing an extensive compound library against specific protein targets implicated in critical cancer pathways to demonstrate the usefulness of these approaches. In addition to summarizing the latest developments in DTB prediction models, this review also identifies their drawbacks. It also highlights the outlook for the DTB prediction domain and future research directions. Combined, these studies present a more comprehensive view of how deep learning offers a quantitative framework for researching drug-target relationships, speeding up the identification of new drug candidates and making it easier to identify possible DTBs.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDrug DiscoveryBenchmarkingComputational BiologyHumansProtein Bindingartificial intelligencecancer drug discoverydeep learningdrug-target affinitydrug–target interaction

Identifiers

PMID40977267
PMCPMC12451107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.