Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40977248›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2025

Feasibility of vNOTES hysterectomy in patients with enlarged uteri: a single-center experience.

Candost Hanedan, Hande Nur Öncü, Neslihan Öztürk, Gökçen Ege, Oğuz Kaan Köksal, Vakkas Korkmaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Candost HanedanClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3435-8943
Hande Nur ÖncüClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9407-2704
Neslihan ÖztürkClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-5578-8718
Gökçen EgeClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2102-3183
Oğuz Kaan KöksalClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9159-7476
Vakkas KorkmazClinic of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8895-6864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and surgical outcomes of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) hysterectomy in patients with enlarged uteri due to benign, premalignant, and malignant conditions. Material and Methods: Patients who underwent vNOTES hysterectomy at a tertiary gynecologic oncology center were included. Patients with large uteri (>280 g or equivalent to >12-week size) were included regardless of prior cesarean delivery, obesity, nulliparity, or the presence of premalignant or malignant pathology. Demographic data, surgical outcomes, and complication details were analyzed. Complications were classified as minor or major. Results: The cohort consisted of 46 women with a median age of 54 (40-74) years, and median body mass index 31 (21-51) kg/m². A history of previous abdominal surgery was present in 58.7%, and 21.7% (10/46) had previously undergone cesarean section. The median operative time was 56 (35-95) minutes, and the median uterine weight was 410 (280-1036) grams. The overall conversion and complication rates were both 4.3% (n=2). No major complications were observed. Minor complications included intraoperative bleeding controlled without transfusion and postoperative vaginal bleeding managed conservatively. The median hospital stay was 30 (16-72) hours. All patients were discharged without requiring reoperation during the postoperative period. Conclusion: vNOTES hysterectomy was a feasible and safe, minimally invasive approach for patients with enlarged uteri, including those with obesity, prior abdominal surgery, and premalignant or malignant indications. It provides favorable surgical outcomes with low complication and conversion rates. This study supports the use of the vNOTES technique with a broader adoption in patients with large uteri.

Indexed as

Hysterectomynatural orifice endoscopic surgeryvNOTES

Identifiers

PMID40977248
PMCPMC12676990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.