ReviewBrain and behavior2025
A GI-Interoceptive Threat Theory of Restrictive Eating: Insights From Active Inference and Chronic Pain.
Review in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A GI-Interoceptive Threat Theory of Restrictive Eating: Insights From Active Inference and Chronic Pain.Brain and behavior · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
introductionRestrictive eating is a common eating disorder (ED) behavior and risk factor. Disturbed body image is also highly associated with the development and maintenance of eating disorders. Yet body image often remains distorted after treatment, and there is little scientific understanding of the mechanisms by which restrictive eating and distorted body image are linked. In parallel, current models of chronic pain describe how fear and negative beliefs about pain lead to avoidance of painful sensations and a threatened response to their occurrence, entrenching a cycle of amplified pain that risks becoming chronic. These models are informed by theories of active inference, which describe how the brain actively shapes sensory experience to reduce prediction errors (discrepancy between predictions and sensory data). This understanding has led to significant advances in the treatment of chronic pain.
methodsTheories of active inference and central sensitization in chronic pain and ED research on fear of fatness and gastrointestinal (GI) interoception were reviewed and integrated to propose a theoretical model of sensitization of GI sensations in EDs.
resultsThrough the lens of active inference, I propose a hypothesis-generating framework that a fatphobic culture confers beliefs that fatness is bad, driving avoidance. Through dieting-an attempt to avoid fatness-interoceptive sensations of fullness/distention come to signify fatness and are thus construed as threatening. Similar to chronic pain, these sensations become amplified and persistent, distorting body image and entrenching restrictive eating patterns. This framework leads to novel proposals for research and treatment.
conclusionsSignificant theoretical advances may be afforded by considering EDs through models of central sensitization and active inference in chronic pain. I propose mechanistic links between interoception, distorted body image, and restrictive eating, and discuss implications and future directions for research and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.