Trial reportCurrent medical imaging2026
Comparison of the Diagnostic Consistency between Delayed Radiographs taken Two Hours and Twenty-four Hours Post Hysterosalpingography using Ultra-Fluid Lipiodol-based Contrast Medium
Trial report in Current medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHysthyosalpingography (HSG) is commonly used to diagnose fallopian tubal disease. At the same time, a 24-hour interval is needed for taking delayed radiographs post-HSG using an oil-based contrast medium, which is inconvenient.
objectiveThis study used an Ultra-Fluid Lipiodol-based contrast medium to compare the diagnostic consistency between delayed radiographs taken 2 hours and 24 hours post-HSG.
methodsIn total, 78 patients who received HSG examinations using ultrafluid lipiodol were enrolled in this cohort study. Then, after 2 hours and 24 hours, delayed radiographs were taken, which were subsequently randomized and assigned to two folders and read by investigators to assess the patency of the fallopian tubes, uterine morphology, and pelvic cavity morphology.
resultsThe delayed radiographs that were taken 2 hours and 24 hours post-HSG revealed substantial agreement in the diagnosis of fallopian tube patency (with a Gwet’s AC1 value of 0.624) and almost perfect agreement in determining uterine morphology (with a Gwet’s AC1 value of 0.943) and pelvic cavity morphology (with a Gwet’s AC1 value of 0.876). Twenty-nine (37.2%) and 3 (3.8%) patients experienced mild and moderate pain, respectively, and 3 (3.8%) patients suffered countercurrent blood flow during the HSG. After HSG, only 9 (11.5%) patients were exposed to mild pain. Vaginal bleeding did not occur either during or after HSG.
conclusionTaking delayed radiographs 2 hours post-HSG using Ultra-Fluid Lipiodol exhibits high consistency in evaluating tubal patency and uterine and pelvic cavity morphology compared with the traditional 24-hour scheme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.