Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40976865›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2026

EBSn, a Robust Synthetic Reporter for Monitoring Ethylene Responses in Plants.

Josefina-Patricia Fernandez-Moreno, Mario Fenech, Anna E Yaschenko, Chengsong Zhao, Matthew Neubauer, Hannah N Davis, Alex J Marchi, Raine Concannon, Alexandra Keren-Keiserman, Moshe Reuveni and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Update of
    2025
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Josefina-Patricia Fernandez-MorenoDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Mario FenechDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Anna E YaschenkoDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Chengsong ZhaoDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Matthew NeubauerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Hannah N DavisDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Alex J MarchiDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Raine ConcannonDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Alexandra Keren-KeisermanDepartment of Vegetables and Field Crops, Institute of Plant Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Rishon Lezion, Israel.
Moshe ReuveniDepartment of Vegetables and Field Crops, Institute of Plant Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Rishon Lezion, Israel.
Victor LevitskyDepartment of Systems Biology, Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Dmitry OshchepkovDepartment of Systems Biology, Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6097-5155
Vladislav DolgikhDepartment of Systems Biology, Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alexander GoldshmidtDepartment of Vegetables and Field Crops, Institute of Plant Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Rishon Lezion, Israel.
José T Ascencio-IbáñezDepartment of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Elena ZemlyanskayaDepartment of Systems Biology, Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Jose M AlonsoDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7087-1571
Anna N StepanovaDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1018-4758

Funding

NC STATE MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAM (MBTP)T32GM133366 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Jason M. Haugh, Robert M Kelly · 2020 to 2026
$3.3M
National Science Foundation 1444561National Science Foundation 1650139National Science Foundation 1750006National Science Foundation 1940829NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM133366Russian State Budgetary Project FWNR-2022-0020U.S. Department of Agriculture 7005468U.S. Department of Agriculture 7005482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethylene is a gaseous plant hormone that controls a wide array of physiologically relevant processes, including plant responses to biotic and abiotic stress, and induces ripening in climacteric fruits. To monitor ethylene in plants, analytical methods, phenotypic assays, gene expression analysis and transcriptional or translational reporters are typically employed. In the model plant Arabidopsis, two ethylene-sensitive synthetic transcriptional reporters have been described, 5xEBS:GUS and 10x2EBS-S10:GUS. These reporters harbour a different type, arrangement and number of homotypic cis-elements in their promoters and thus may recruit the ethylene master regulator EIN3 in the context of alternative transcriptional complexes. Accordingly, the patterns of GUS activity in these transgenic lines differ and neither of them encompasses all plant tissues even in the presence of saturating levels of exogenous ethylene. Herein, we set out to develop and test a more sensitive version of the ethylene-inducible promoter that we refer to as EBSnew (abbreviated as EBSn). EBSn leverages a tandem of 10 non-identical, natural copies of a novel, dual, everted, 11 bp-long EIN3-binding site, 2EBS(-1). We show that in Arabidopsis, EBSn outperforms its predecessors in terms of its ethylene sensitivity, having the capacity to monitor endogenous levels of ethylene and displaying more ubiquitous expression in response to the exogenous hormone. We demonstrate that the EBSn promoter is also functional in tomato, opening new avenues to manipulating ethylene-regulated processes, such as ripening and senescence, in crops.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisEthylenesGenes, ReporterPlant Growth RegulatorsArabidopsis ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlants, Genetically ModifiedPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription FactorsArabidopsis ProteinsethyleneEthylenesPlant Growth RegulatorsTranscription FactorsArabidopsisEBSnEIN3‐binding siteethylene reporterhormone detectionplantssynthetic promotertomato

Identifiers

PMID40976865
PMCPMC12906842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.