ArticleDoklady. Biochemistry and biophysics2025
Effect of a Comparative Analysis of Different Annotations of the Oryza sativa Rice Genome for In Silico Verification of Predicted Promoter Sequences.
Article in Doklady. Biochemistry and biophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, promoter sequences predicted by the MAHDS method in the Oryza sativa genome were analyzed using three genome annotations: RefSeq NCBI, Rice Genome Annotation Project, and Ensembl. Part of the predicted promoters was found to be located near annotated genes, which indicates their potential functional role. The remaining sequences, considered as potentially novel regulatory elements, were examined using YAPP for the presence of core promoter motifs and their functional combinations. All analyzed predicted promoters contain either an Inr or a TATA motif-the key elements involved in transcription initiation. The identified motif combinations suggest a high likelihood of transcriptional activity in these sequences, and the consistency of the results with annotated data and CAGE-seq signals supports the reliability and applicability of the MAHDS method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40976834What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.