Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40976833›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Causes of neonatal mortality in the European Economic Area and Switzerland: a WHO-based analysis and systematic review.

Elizabeth E la Cour, Veronica N E Malange, Tasnim Mohaissen, Michael Christiansen, Jesper Sune Brok, Christina Gade, Ulrik Lausten-Thomsen, Paula L Hedley

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Letter to the editor: Perinatal mortality in eastern Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth E la CourDepartment for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej DK2300S, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9728-805X
Veronica N E MalangeDepartment for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej DK2300S, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6411-6110
Tasnim MohaissenDepartment for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej DK2300S, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7495-3945
Michael ChristiansenDepartment for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej DK2300S, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4713-755X
Jesper Sune BrokDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2576-0228
Christina GadeDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0007-6158
Ulrik Lausten-ThomsenDepartment for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej DK2300S, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1136-4347
Paula L HedleyDepartment for Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej DK2300S, Copenhagen, Denmark. phy@ssi.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5801-960X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify reported causes of neonatal death across the European Economic Area (EEA) member states and Switzerland as of 1 January 2010 (hereafter referred to as the European Region) and, where possible, examine the cause-specific distribution of neonatal deaths over time. We conducted a two-pronged analysis: (1) database analysis using WHO public datasets (2000-2021) for 28 countries in the European Region and (2) a systematic review and meta-analysis of pertinent records from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, which were comprehensively reviewed against inclusion criteria up to 10 August 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. The average neonatal mortality rate (NMRs) between 2000 and 2021 in WHO data was 2.63 per 1000 live births, with a significant decline (-0.074 per year) across the region. Prematurity (41.2%) and congenital anomalies (28.9%) were the most common registered causes of neonatal death; however, WHO data lacked etiological detail to reliably analyze cause-specific trends. The systematic review identified 41 eligible studies, of which 15 were included in meta-analyses. Pooled estimates showed that congenital anomalies and prematurity accounted for 30% (95% CI 17-46) and 31% (95% CI 18-49) of deaths, respectively. Among extremely preterm neonates, infections, respiratory, and cardiovascular disorders were the most common reported causes of death.      Conclusion: NMRs across the European Region are declining, with prematurity and congenital anomalies being leading causes of neonatal death. Current reporting frameworks lack granularity, and a wider adoption of standardized classification systems is critical to improving surveillance and data comparability, especially for preterm infants. What is Known: • Neonatal mortality rates have declined across Europe over recent decades. • There are considerable regional disparities in both causes and rates of neonatal death. What is New: • Prematurity and congenital anomalies each account for ~30% of neonatal deaths. • Greater use of standardized classifications of neonatal death causes is urgently needed.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityCause of DeathEuropeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornSwitzerlandWorld Health OrganizationCause of deathCongenital anomaliesEuropeICD-PMNeonatal mortalityPrematurity

Identifiers

PMID40976833
PMCPMC12450820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.