Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40976831›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2025

De-escalating axillary surgery in node-positive early breast cancer patients undergoing primary surgery: current evidence and recommendations.

Hussain Abdulla, Eman Hamza, Maha Alsendi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hussain AbdullaGovernment Hospitals, Manama, Bahrain. habdulla28@health.gov.bh.
Eman HamzaBahrain Oncology Center, Busaiteen, Bahrain.
Maha AlsendiBahrain Oncology Center, Busaiteen, Bahrain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Landmark trials have shown that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be safely omitted in early breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive nodes. Despite lack of prospective data, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend that patients with 1-2 suspicious or biopsy-proven positive lymph nodes having primary surgery can undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). In the era of de-escalation of axillary surgery, breast cancer management in patients with clinically node-positive (cN +) axilla is driven by tumour biology and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). In this review, we discuss the management of the axilla in early breast cancer patients with low-volume biopsy-proven nodal disease and summarise the evidence supporting omission of ALND in these patients undergoing primary surgery.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesAxillaFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPractice Guidelines as TopicSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAxillary lymph node dissectionClinically node-positive axillaDe-escalationPrimary surgerySentinel lymph node biopsyTargeted axillary dissectionUpfront surgery

Identifiers

PMID40976831
PMCPMC13313446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.