ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Facilitating consumer partnerships in health research.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundConsumer engagement and involvement in health research is a well-established and growing priority for a better-informed public, a broader voice for research in relation to impact and funding, and guidance toward issues that matter most to consumers. These well recognized benefits of consumer engagement in research can be strengthened through training.
methodsWe describe a workshop for health researchers and consumers that was designed to provide a networking opportunity and introductory training, drawing from experience in Australia and the United States. Participants completed pre- and post-workshop surveys to assess the impact of the workshop.
resultsThe workshop led to enhanced consumer awareness of contributions that can be made to all stages of the research cycle. Researchers who participated in the workshop had improved confidence and understanding of how to build partnerships with consumers. The development of sustainable financial models to provide ongoing training opportunities for consumers and researchers was identified as a critical priority. The workshop also led to the establishment of a new model that classifies consumer contributions to research into three tiers, based on varying levels of time commitment, training, scientific understanding, and managerial skills.
conclusionThe workshop was well received as a networking and training opportunity, complementing other training frameworks for consumers and researchers. Training, funding, and supportive institutional policies were identified as key enablers for effective collaboration between consumers and researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.