Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40976802›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025

Facilitating consumer partnerships in health research.

Raluca Ghebosu, Leonie Young, Benedette Watson, Merran Williams, Ashley Dedmon, Jo Maxwell, Erik W Thompson, Fernando Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes, Joy Wolfram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Raluca Ghebosu *Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Leonie Young *Breast Cancer Consumer, Brisbane, QLD, 4113, Australia.
Benedette WatsonTranslational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia.
Merran WilliamsBreast Cancer Consumer, Buderim, QLD, 4556, Australia.
Ashley DedmonBreast Cancer Consumer, Houston, TX, 77001, USA.
Jo MaxwellFaculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Erik W ThompsonSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, Faculty of Health, Translational Research Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia. e2.thompson@qut.edu.au.
Fernando Souza-Fonseca-GuimaraesFrazer Institute, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia. f.guimaraes@uq.edu.au.
Joy WolframAustralian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. j.wolfram@uq.edu.au.

Funding

Medical Research Future Fund MRFF2019485National Breast Cancer Foundation 2023/IIRS0063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsumer engagement and involvement in health research is a well-established and growing priority for a better-informed public, a broader voice for research in relation to impact and funding, and guidance toward issues that matter most to consumers. These well recognized benefits of consumer engagement in research can be strengthened through training.

methodsWe describe a workshop for health researchers and consumers that was designed to provide a networking opportunity and introductory training, drawing from experience in Australia and the United States. Participants completed pre- and post-workshop surveys to assess the impact of the workshop.

resultsThe workshop led to enhanced consumer awareness of contributions that can be made to all stages of the research cycle. Researchers who participated in the workshop had improved confidence and understanding of how to build partnerships with consumers. The development of sustainable financial models to provide ongoing training opportunities for consumers and researchers was identified as a critical priority. The workshop also led to the establishment of a new model that classifies consumer contributions to research into three tiers, based on varying levels of time commitment, training, scientific understanding, and managerial skills.

conclusionThe workshop was well received as a networking and training opportunity, complementing other training frameworks for consumers and researchers. Training, funding, and supportive institutional policies were identified as key enablers for effective collaboration between consumers and researchers.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationCooperative BehaviorAustraliaHumansResearch PersonnelCo-designCollaborationLived experiencePatient advocatePatient and public involvementPatient partnerTrainingWorkshop

Identifiers

PMID40976802
PMCPMC12452011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.