ArticleEuropean urology oncology2026
Genomic Predictors of Response to Metastasis-directed Therapy With or Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy.
Article in European urology oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and multicohort external validation of a preoperative [18F]PSMA-1007 PET-derived deep learning score and multimodal model for predicting biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is an emerging treatment option for metachronous oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) and can delay time to progression and the need to initiate androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, optimal ways to synergize MDT and ADT are not known, and better personalization of MDT is needed. We examined the role of combined ADT and MDT and the ability of genomic alterations to provide prognostic and predictive information regarding response to MDT. We found that high-risk (HiRi) mutations in TP53, BRCA1/2, ATM, and Rb1 are poor prognostic markers in omCSPC. In addition, patients harboring HiRi mutations experienced greater benefit from addition of ADT to MDT, indicating that these alterations are predictive biomarkers for treatment intensification. Our results suggest that genetic biomarkers might aid in treatment personalization for patients with omCSPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.