ArticleExperimental animals2026
Educational efficacy of training videos and simulators for teaching basic mouse experimental skills to novice veterinary students.
Article in Experimental animals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alternative educational tools, such as training videos and simulators, are recommended in the education of laboratory animal science. However, evidence supporting their educational utility in the training of rodent experimental techniques remains limited. In this study, we assessed the utility of alternative educational tools in the practice of laboratory animal science for novice veterinary students. 149 students participated in a stepwise program beginning with lectures, followed by preparatory learning sessions using training videos and two types of mouse simulators (a silicone-based model and fabric toy mouse), and then hands-on training with live mice. The program covered basic techniques: habituation, restraint, and vaginal smear sampling for estrous cycle determination. A survey-based evaluation was conducted to assess the educational utility of alternative educational tools. The contribution of each preparatory resource (videos, lectures, simulators, printed materials, and notes) to skill acquisition was evaluated, showing that videos, lectures, and printed materials highly contributed. The training videos were rated as more necessary than the simulators for skill acquisition. Psychological evaluation showed that 84% of students experienced anxiety before practice. A positive correlation was found between anxiety levels and frequency of use for all three tools, and students reported that all tools were effective in reducing anxiety during practice. All techniques showed high proficiency rates. Our findings suggest that integrating alternative tools with live-animal training promotes technical skill acquisition, enhances psychological readiness, and supports 3Rs-based laboratory animal practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.