ArticleBMJ open2025
Development of a work-integrated learning programme for chronic pain physiotherapy in Dutch private practice using co-design methods: description of a journey.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence of Patients With Pain Consulting Physiotherapists (PHYSIODOL Survey). A Nationwide Survey in France.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysiotherapists recognise the biopsychosocial model as important in treating chronic pain. However, the adoption of this model in Dutch private practice is limited. Participatory action research, including co-design methods and an explicit perspective on workplace learning, may be helpful in developing a work-integrated learning programme to facilitate the use of a biopsychosocial perspective in private practice physiotherapy.
objectiveTo give insight into the development of a work-integrated learning programme for private practice physiotherapists in assessing and treating patients with chronic pain from a biopsychosocial perspective.
methodsAn interprofessional development team of designers, developers, educational professionals and researchers engaged in a co-design process together with private practice physiotherapists, experts in chronic pain, patients and other relevant stakeholders. In this design process, the team developed several prototypes and the subsequent work-integrated learning programme during three 2-week design sprints, living-lab tests and validation sessions. All available co-design data were structured and analysed by three researchers, resulting in a plan of requirements as a foundation for the work-integrated learning programme.
resultsThe data rendered two specific outcomes: (1) a plan of requirements to be used as an educational foundation for the work-integrated learning programme and (2) several prototypes based on the underlying principles that are used in the development and validation of the work-integrated learning programme.
conclusionsThis study shows how co-design methods can be successfully applied to generate insights and develop interventions that bridge theory and practice for physiotherapists working in private practice. The designed prototypes and subsequent distilled plan of requirements for the development of a work-integrated learning programme offer new opportunities to facilitate the transition to working from a biopsychosocial perspective in private practice physiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RAAK.PUB06.014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.