Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40976666›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Scoping review of interventions aimed at promoting healthy screen use among adolescents.

Wing Lam Tock, Lise Gauvin, Frédérique Hudon, Frédérique Tremblay, Richard E Bélanger, Anne-Marie Turcotte-Tremblay

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wing Lam TockDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1614-3770
Lise GauvinDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Frédérique HudonFaculté de médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Frédérique TremblayFaculté de médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Richard E BélangerFaculté de médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Anne-Marie Turcotte-TremblayVITAM Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Québec, Québec, Canada anne-marie.turcotte-tremblay@fsi.ulaval.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this scoping review is to map and synthesise existing literature on interventions aimed at promoting healthy screen use among adolescents. This review identifies the types, functions and settings of interventions, explores the diversity of targeted outcomes and highlights equity considerations and research gaps.

designWe conducted a scoping review in accordance with the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched Medline, PsycINFO and ERIC from January 2013 to June 2024. Reference lists of included studies were also manually screened. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included peer-reviewed experimental, quasi-experimental, observational and qualitative studies reporting on interventions designed to promote healthy screen use among adolescents aged 10-19 years. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: One author extracted data using a structured charting form, and a second author verified all entries. Results were synthesised descriptively across key themes including target populations, theoretical frameworks, intervention components and reported outcomes.

resultsFrom 6433 records, we identified 93 articles on 81 interventions, mainly conducted in high school settings in the USA and Australia. Most examined short-term interventions targeting recreational screen time. Outcomes included media literacy, cyberbullying, internet and gaming addiction, safe internet use, social media use and mental and sexual health. Seventy-eight per cent of interventions attempted to educate adolescents, while 34% offered training activities (eg, educational sessions to elevate risk awareness and skill-based training to enhance digital literacy and self-regulation). Interventions targeting external influences were used less frequently. About 20% of studies showed no statistically significant findings, highlighting the need to promote evidence-based interventions.

conclusionThis review identifies a need for broader, multilevel strategies that account for contextual factors and social determinants in influencing screen use and its related health issues. Future research should explore long-term effectiveness while examining the potential moderating and mediating effects of social determinants. Equity considerations were not a primary focus of most interventions, underscoring an important gap in this literature. Future interventions could incorporate equity-focused design and evaluation to ensure they respond to the needs of diverse adolescent populations.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorHealth PromotionScreen TimeAdolescentChildHumansYoung AdultAdolescentsBehaviorPUBLIC HEALTHSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID40976666
PMCPMC12458889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.