Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40976662›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2025

Association of non-standard working time arrangements with safety incidents: a systematic review.

Line Victoria Moen, Jenny-Anne S Lie, Tom Sterud, Jan Olav Christensen, Fred Haugen, Marit Skogstad, Karl-Christian Nordby, Dagfinn Matre

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prevalence of night work in the Brazilian employed population.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Line Victoria MoenNational Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway line.moen@stami.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6270-6363
Jenny-Anne S LieNational Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
Tom SterudNational Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
Jan Olav ChristensenNational Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
Fred HaugenNational Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7201-7344
Marit SkogstadNational Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6126-4435
Karl-Christian NordbyNational Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
Dagfinn MatreNational Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0042-6389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review the evidence on the association between non-standard working time arrangements (such as night work or shift work) and the occurrence of safety incidents.

designSystematic review conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and using a structured narrative approach and the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis framework to evaluate and summarise findings. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and ProQuest Health and Safety Science Abstracts were searched through February 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included peer-reviewed English-language studies of paid workers (18-70 years) that examined the association between non-standard working time arrangements and safety incidents (accidents, near-accidents, safety incidents or injuries), excluding cross-sectional designs and studies on unpaid workers, athletes or military personnel. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using standardised forms, extracting study characteristics (author, year, country, sector and population), working time arrangements and exposure assessment, outcomes and their assessment, and reported risk estimates. We conducted a narrative synthesis, classifying studies into three exposure contrasts (shift worker versus non-shift worker, time-of-day and shift intensity), and summarised risk estimates using forest plots without calculating pooled effects.

resultsA total of 13 569 records were screened, and 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated that shift workers generally had an elevated safety incident risk compared with non-shift workers (risk estimates ranged from 1.11 to 5.33). Most of the included studies found an increased risk of safety incidents during or after night shifts. Accumulated exposure to evening or night shifts increased the risk of safety incidents during the following 7 days. However, bias and heterogeneity across studies in design, populations and outcome measures resulted in an overall low to very low certainty of the evidence.

conclusionsNon-standard working time arrangements, including night and evening shifts, appear to increase the risk of occupational safety incidents. Despite the low certainty of evidence, the findings highlight a potential area for preventive measures in work scheduling. Future longitudinal studies using individual data on daily working hours are needed.

Indexed as

Accidents, OccupationalOccupational HealthPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingShift Work ScheduleWork Schedule ToleranceHumansOccupational Health ServicesReviewSystematic ReviewWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID40976662
PMCPMC12458805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.