SynthesisBMJ open2025
Association of non-standard working time arrangements with safety incidents: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiology of major work-related injuries in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: a 10-year retrospective study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Permanent night work and risk of injuries: A register-based cohort study using payroll data.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2026Article
- Associations between shift work characteristics and work-related accidents and dozing off: combining objective working-time register and retrospective survey data.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2026Article
- Prevalence of night work in the Brazilian employed population.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMTArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically review the evidence on the association between non-standard working time arrangements (such as night work or shift work) and the occurrence of safety incidents.
designSystematic review conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and using a structured narrative approach and the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis framework to evaluate and summarise findings. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and ProQuest Health and Safety Science Abstracts were searched through February 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included peer-reviewed English-language studies of paid workers (18-70 years) that examined the association between non-standard working time arrangements and safety incidents (accidents, near-accidents, safety incidents or injuries), excluding cross-sectional designs and studies on unpaid workers, athletes or military personnel. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using standardised forms, extracting study characteristics (author, year, country, sector and population), working time arrangements and exposure assessment, outcomes and their assessment, and reported risk estimates. We conducted a narrative synthesis, classifying studies into three exposure contrasts (shift worker versus non-shift worker, time-of-day and shift intensity), and summarised risk estimates using forest plots without calculating pooled effects.
resultsA total of 13 569 records were screened, and 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated that shift workers generally had an elevated safety incident risk compared with non-shift workers (risk estimates ranged from 1.11 to 5.33). Most of the included studies found an increased risk of safety incidents during or after night shifts. Accumulated exposure to evening or night shifts increased the risk of safety incidents during the following 7 days. However, bias and heterogeneity across studies in design, populations and outcome measures resulted in an overall low to very low certainty of the evidence.
conclusionsNon-standard working time arrangements, including night and evening shifts, appear to increase the risk of occupational safety incidents. Despite the low certainty of evidence, the findings highlight a potential area for preventive measures in work scheduling. Future longitudinal studies using individual data on daily working hours are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.