Trial reportKorean journal of ophthalmology : KJO2025
Clinical Efficacy of Electrical Auricular Transcutaneous Stimulation for Dry Eye: A Sham-Controlled, Randomized Trial.
Trial report in Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of low-frequency ear transcutaneous stimulation (TS) for improving ocular symptoms and signs in patients with dry eye disease (DED). The primary outcome was the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score difference between TS and sham groups, while secondary outcomes included tear breakup time (TBUT), Schirmer test (strip meniscometry tube, SMTube), and corneal staining (National Eye Institute [NEI] score).
methodsPatients with a TBUT <5 seconds and tear volume by Schirmer test <5 mm, along with ocular symptoms, were randomized into a TS treatment group (n = 25) and a sham group (n = 24). The TS treatment device was applied bilaterally twice daily for 8 weeks, with each session lasting 30 minutes. The OSDI questionnaire score, corneal and conjunctival stain score (NEI score), TBUT, and tear secretion volume (SMTube) were analyzed at baseline and 4 and 8 weeks after treatment.
resultsThe sham group showed no significant changes in any parameters at 4 and 8 weeks. The TS group demonstrated significant improvements in NEI score, TBUT, and SM tube values at both 4 and 8 weeks compared to the sham group (p = 0.002, p = 0.001, and p = 0.017, respectively, at 4 weeks; p = 0.001, p = 0.001, and p = 0.001, respectively, at 8 weeks). No significant difference in OSDI was found between groups at 4 weeks (p = 0.061), but at 8 weeks, the TS group showed a significantly greater improvement (p = 0.018).
conclusionsThe low-frequency ear TS device significantly improved DED symptoms and objective measures compared to the sham group. These findings support the potential of TS as a novel treatment option for DED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.