ArticleThe clinical teacher2025
Patients and Community Members as Equal Partners in Curriculum Decision-Making.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patients and Community Members as Equal Partners in Curriculum Decision-Making.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients and community members make essential contributions to health professional education, which has consistently demonstrated a positive impact on student learning. However, patients and community members do not often have the opportunity for formal participation at higher levels outside instructional spaces. Teaching faculty leaders in the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences at the University of British Columbia formed the Indigenous Advisory Committee (IAC) whereby community members contribute as equal partners in curriculum decision-making. APPROACH: The IAC provided oversight and authority on the decolonisation and Indigenisation efforts in the pharmacy programme and was formally embedded in the governance model and reporting structure of the curriculum committee. Majority membership was Indigenous members to ensure these experts were the leading voice. The IAC developed five curricular pillars and accompanying core learning objectives to underpin all Indigenous content across the pharmacy programme and devised an engagement pathway for collaboration with community partners. EVALUATION: Key changes were implemented in the pharmacy curriculum, including a mandatory Indigenous Health and Cultural Safety course, the first of its kind among pharmacy programmes in Canada. In formal committee feedback, community members described feeling valued as their input is reflected and prioritised in decision-making. Student members were motivated to form a new social club for Indigenous students to connect and share cultural experiences. IMPACT: The work of IAC ensured relevant student courses and content was rooted in authentic lived experiences with a community-informed focus on strengths and needs. Equal-partner roles in curriculum decision-making loosened conventional hierarchical structures and reinforced community relationships and forged new collaborations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.