ArticlePediatrics2025
Patterns of Infant Sleep and Care Practices: 2016-2020.
Article in Pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Layered risk factors for sudden unexpected infant death.Injury epidemiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) publishes evidence-based infant sleep recommendations to prevent sudden unexpected infant death (SUID). We defined common patterns of infant sleep and care practices in Illinois and assessed variation in patterns across demographic characteristics.
methodsWe measured maternal report of AAP recommended practices in the 2016-2020 Illinois Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, including breastfeeding greater than or equal to 8 weeks; no maternal smoking; and 4 aspects of the sleep environment for infant sleeping on back, on an approved surface, without items in sleep area, and without bed sharing. We applied nonhierarchical cluster analysis, coupled with knowledge of AAP recommendations, to define 6 mutually exclusive patterns of infant sleep and care practices. We produced weighted prevalence estimates for each individual practice and pattern and examined differences by maternal race and ethnicity, age, parity, education, and socioeconomic status using χ2 tests.
resultsPrevalence estimates for individual practices ranged from 49.6% for infants sleeping without items in sleep area to 90.8% for not smoking. When examining patterns, only 19.3% of new mothers reported all 6 recommended practices; this pattern varied significantly across all demographics examined. The prevalence of the other 5 patterns were as follows: 8.1% following all 4 sleep environment practices, 28.1% bed sharing and breastfeeding, 11.7% bed sharing and no breastfeeding, 25.1% no bed sharing and back sleep positioning, and 7.8% no bed sharing and no back sleep positioning.
conclusionExamining common patterns of infant sleep and care practices provides improved understanding of how infant sleep recommendations are followed and may inform intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.