Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40976578›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025

Contemporary strategies for repeat ablation of atrial fibrillation: a European Heart Rhythm Association survey.

Sergio Conti, Ante Anic, Giulio Conte, Christian-H Heeger, Jarkko Karvonen, Andreas Metzner, Mark T Mills, Martina Nesti, Diego Penela, Rui Providencia and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Ethanol infusion of the vein of marshall-based strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Circulating miR-10b-5p as a candidate biomarker of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: a two-phase translational study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Shortest pulmonary vein atrial fibrillation cycle length identifies pulmonary vein isolation responders beyond clinical atrial fibrillation pattern: the FARS-AF II study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sergio ContiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Section of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of Iowa Health Care, The Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6683-6781
Ante AnicDepartment for Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Center Split, Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-6864-3999
Giulio ConteDivision of Cardiology, Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2248-3456
Christian-H HeegerGerman Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9014-8097
Jarkko KarvonenHeart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0686-2782
Andreas MetznerUniversity Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6818-6396
Mark T MillsDepartment of Cardiology, Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Thomas Drive, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5425-7739
Martina NestiDepartment of Cardiology, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8995-3884
Diego PenelaArrhythmology Department, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-7221-4829
Rui ProvidenciaInstitute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9141-9883
Laurent RotenDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0827-1329
Martin H RuwaldDivision of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1541-309X
Kostantinos VlachosIHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7543-3236
Maura M ZyllaDepartment of Cardiology, Heidelberg Center of Heart Rhythm Disorders, Medical University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9373-8132
Kyoung-Ryul Julian ChunCardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2355-6015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, the optimal strategy during repeat ablation is not clear. This European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey aims to assess real-world ablation strategies in patients undergoing repeat AF ablation. METHODS AND

resultsA 25-item questionnaire was distributed among healthcare professionals via EHRA between 22 May and 21 June 2024. Of the 211 respondents from 43 countries, 58.1% of respondents planned a redo after multiple symptomatic recurrences of atrial arrhythmias. Most repeat procedures (68.0%) are performed within 3 months after the decision for re-intervention. 3D mapping and radiofrequency (RF) catheters with contact force (CF) sensing are the most common modality used for repeat ablation. In patients with more than one pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection, most commonly reisolation of the PVs plus individualized substrate-based ablation is performed (62.2%). When empirical ablation is performed, the most common targets include cavotricuspid isthmus (22.5%), posterior wall isolation (20.7%), left atrial roofline (16.1%), anterior line (12.9%), superior vena cava (8.6%), and vein of Marshall (8.6%). In patients without PV reconnection at repeat procedure, substrate mapping/individualized ablation is the preferred strategy (77.9%). No additional right atrial ablation beyond the CTI was reported. The majority of respondents (60.7%) consider rate control after ≥3 failed ablations.

conclusionReal-world strategies for repeat AF ablation show significant variability. 3D mapping and CF-guided RF ablation are commonly utilized. Re-PVI and substrate-based ablation are the predominant approaches. However, the optimal strategy beyond durable PVI remains to be further evaluated.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationPractice Patterns, Physicians'Pulmonary VeinsReoperationEuropeHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleRecurrenceSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeAblation strategyAblation technologiesArrhythmia recurrenceAtrial fibrillationRepeat procedures

Identifiers

PMID40976578
PMCPMC12602869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.