ArticleNeuroImage2025
Measuring the potential risk of re-identification of imaging research participants from open-source automated face recognition software.
Article in NeuroImage, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years facial recognition software has gone from an area of research to widespread adoption and broad public availability. Open-source face recognition packages are freely available on the internet for anyone to download, and several public websites allow users to run facial recognition on photos without needing any technical knowledge or equipment beyond internet access, making facial recognition accessible for anyone to use for any purpose. Previous research has demonstrated the ability of commercial software to identify a person based on facial content in brain imaging. In this study we tested two commercial facial recognition programs and a variety of popular open-source computer vision and facial recognition software packages to measure how accurately they could be used for reidentification of research participants in brain imaging studies. We tested a "population to sample" threat model, measuring the rates of success for which face recognition software selected the correct MRI-based face reconstruction from a set of 182 participants as its top-scoring match for input facial photographs. We found that the freely available open-source software packages we tested can reidentify a research participant with up to 59 % accuracy. This was less than the commercial packages, which were able to achieve much higher accuracies in the ranges of 92 % and 98 % in identical testing scenarios, but it demonstrates the feasibility of re-identifying faces in research MRI even by individuals with access to only freely available software. As the trust and confidence of potential participants is essential to brain imaging research, especially with widespread and mandated data-sharing of brain scans, this further supports the need to replace identifiable face imagery in brain images to protect the privacy of research participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.