ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2025
Inequities in eating disorder diagnoses in college students: An intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA).
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eating disorders contribute significantly to negative health outcomes across a broad range of domains. Despite their often-debilitating effects, they remain understudied, especially with respect to the experiences of people who are marginalized by multiple structural systems of power and oppression. The intersectionality framework highlights the mutually constitutive nature of those systems and the ways by which they uniquely shape lived experiences within and between populations. We used data from the American College Health Association National College Health Assessment III (ACHA-NCHA III), a repeated cross-sectional survey of college students, to estimate the prevalence of eating disorder diagnoses across intersections of gender identity, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, and parental education via a Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA). Two models were fit, one assessing only stratum-specific variations and another including race/ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, and parental education as main effects. The prevalence of eating disorder diagnoses in the sample was 5.13 %, with stratum-specific prevalence estimates ranging from 0.44 % for Black, straight, cisgender men whose parents have a bachelor's degree to 19.20 % for transfeminine and nonbinary, bisexual/pansexual, Indigenous people whose parents have more than a bachelor's degree. There was a large main effect of gender identity, with strata inclusive of transfeminine and nonbinary individuals having 6.55 times greater odds (95 % CI: 5.70-7.51) of eating disorder diagnoses compared to cisgender men. Intersectional interactions between gender identity, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, and parental education contributed to 2.66 % excess prevalence among White, bisexual/pansexual, cisgender women whose parents had less than a bachelor's degree, and 2.93 % lower prevalence among White, gay/lesbian, transfeminine and nonbinary people whose parents had less than a bachelor's degree. These findings emphasize the concerning inequities in eating disorder diagnoses among college students, and call attention to the multiple, interlocking systems of power and oppression that shape them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.