Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40975841›Full record

ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2026

Aligning Indigenous and Western Concepts of Health Resource Decision Making in a Western Canadian First Nations Context.

Aidan Neill, Stephanie Montesanti, Lea Bill, Barbara S E Verstraeten, Rhonda C Bell, Richard T Oster, Arto Ohinmaa, Mike Paulden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aidan NeillSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. aaneill@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0009-0009-2156-620X
Stephanie MontesantiSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3284-5767
Lea BillAlberta First Nations Information Governance Center, Calgary, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5430-4902
Barbara S E VerstraetenSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0539-8877
Rhonda C BellSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4298-9641
Richard T OsterDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0657-9263
Arto OhinmaaSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7094-1573
Mike PauldenSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0381-5980

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CA) Team Grant: I-HeLTI Cohort Research Study
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWestern health economic evaluation tools often fail to reflect the relational, collective, and holistic perspectives that underpin Indigenous concepts of health. These limitations pose challenges when applying Western measures in Indigenous contexts. The individualistic foundation of the Western definition of health and the values that inform it are significantly different from the community-based values typically found in Canadian Indigenous communities. For health economics to effectively support Indigenous health decision making, a values-based approach should initially be undertaken to identify conceptual commonalities with Western perspectives.

aimsThis study aimed to develop a conceptual framework that identifies shared elements between Western and First Nations understandings of health resource decision making, with the goal of supporting the creation of culturally meaningful health outcome measures.

methodsThrough a Health Economics Technical Advisory Group (HE-TAG) in Alberta, Canada, co-led by Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers, we conducted a conceptual exploration of health resource decision making. Fourteen HE-TAG sessions held between July 2021 and June 2023 were transcribed and analyzed using a hybrid approach-combining Q methodology, thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke), and Walker and Avant's concept analysis. DATA: Transcripts from 14 HE-TAG sessions provide the qualitative data upon which analysis was conducted. Sessions were held online using virtual meeting technology, and recordings were transcribed and analyzed.

resultsIndigenous and Western conceptual frameworks allow for a common understanding of health resourcing. Indigenous community and culture and Western economic evaluation and social determinants of health were the four main observed themes, each of which contained two subthemes which differentiated between concepts of 'health.' Five concepts were found to resonate between Indigenous and Western themes when exploring health resource thinking: values, holism, time, resources, and context. Concepts and themes were mapped to illustrate common approaches to understanding health resource decision making.

conclusionsThis Indigenous-informed research aligns concepts of resource decision making by showing the thematic backgrounds of First Nations and Western thinking, which are linked by the common concepts of values, holism, time, resources, and context. Centering future community engagement on these shared concepts while grounding them in community-generated health value sets can advance the development of novel, culturally relevant health outcome measures.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth ResourcesHealth Services, IndigenousIndigenous CanadiansInuitAlbertaCanadaHumans

Identifiers

PMID40975841
PMCPMC12790536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.