ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
IBI-DT: a novel approach combining individualized Bayesian inference and decision tree for identifying cancer drivers and their interactions.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and External Validation of an Explainable Machine-Learning Model for Predicting Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Older Adults Undergoing Degenerative Spine Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Novel Alzheimer's disease-associated variants and genetic interactions identified from UK biobank whole-exome sequencing data using IBI-DT.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer is mainly caused by a relatively small portion of somatic genome alterations (SGAs), called cancer drivers. Despite success in identifying a good number of cancer drivers, many more remain to be discovered to explain various cancers. Moreover, limited tools are available to identify potential interactions among cancer drivers for a better understanding of oncogenesis. To tackle these challenges, we have developed a novel approach called individualized Bayesian inference using a decision tree (IBI-DT). IBI-DT recognizes the genetic heterogeneity among cancer patients, where different individuals or patient subgroups of distinct genomic makeup may have different drivers. IBI-DT works by constructing smaller subgroups with similar genetic makeup (i.e. patient-like-me subgroups) using a decision tree structure and analyzing multiple trees to identify the SGAs that play a significant role in regulating downstream gene expression patterns at the subgroup and individual levels. This is distinct from population-based approaches, which tend to evaluate the influence of an SGA for the entire population, thereby likely missing low-frequency SGAs that may well explain a small subgroup of cancer patients. Also importantly, IBI-DT can efficiently identify cancer drivers that may have functional interactions. We applied IBI-DT to identify cancer drivers regulating the downstream differential gene expression in cancer patients and compared it to the standard, population-based method of expression quantitative trait loci analysis. Our results show that IBI-DT performs well in identifying both important cancer drivers, especially the low-frequency drivers, and their interactions, allowing for a better understanding of the cancer signaling pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.