ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Does Intraoperative Radiation Therapy Provide Comparable Local Control to Partial Breast Irradiation in Patients Suitable for Omission of RT?
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPartial breast irradiation (PBI) offers the ability for smaller treatment volumes, reduced toxicities, and shorter treatment duration. One alternative to PBI is intraoperative radiation (IORT), though local control outcomes are mixed. The purpose of this analysis is to compare outcomes with PBI and IORT, including in those patients suitable for omission of radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients with early stage breast cancer who received PBI or IORT between 2011 and 2021 were evaluated. PBI patients received 30 Gy in 5 fractions and IORT patients received 20 Gy in 1 fraction using a 50 kv device. Patients with less than 2 years of follow-up were excluded from the analysis.
resultsA total of 245 patients with a median age of 67 years received PBI, and 202 patients with a median age of 70 years received IORT. Median follow-up was 3.5 years for PBI and 6.5 years for IORT; 5-year local control (LC) was 99.6% for PBI versus 94.7% for IORT (p = 0.01). For patients meeting PRIME II criteria, 5-year LC was 99.2% for PBI versus 94.1% for IORT (p = 0.09), while for patients meeting CALGB 9343 criteria, 5-year LC was 100% for PBI versus 94.8% for IORT (p = 0.11).
conclusionsIORT has worse local control as compared with 5-fraction PBI, even among patients eligible for omission of RT. Given concerns regarding compliance with endocrine therapy, for patients eligible for omission of RT, 5 fraction PBI offers a convenient treatment option to optimize local control, while IORT has a limited role as monotherapy, consistent with current guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40975735What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.