ArticleBrain stimulation
Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of motor-evoked potential recruitment curves yields accurate and robust estimates.
Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07561372 (Enhancing Speed and Accuracy of Motor Evoked Potential Recruitment Curve Analysis Using Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enhancing Speed and Accuracy of Motor Evoked Potential Recruitment Curve Analysis Using Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timing-dependent synergies between noninvasive motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation in chronic cervical spinal cord injury.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Electrode position, size, and orientation determine efficacy of cervical epidural stimulation to recruit forelimb muscles in rats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Softening, Conformable, and Stretchable Conductors for Implantable Bioelectronics Interfaces.Advanced materials technologies · 2025Article
- Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of motor-evoked potential recruitment curves yields accurate and robust estimates.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe aim to develop a robust method to improve the estimation accuracy of motor-evoked potential (MEP) recruitment curves (RCs), including motor threshold, in small-sample settings which typically involve fewer than 40 stimuli.
methodsWe present a hierarchical Bayesian (HB) method to model MEP size as a rectified-logistic function of stimulation intensity. This method is designed to account for small samples, handle outliers without discarding data, quantify estimation uncertainty, and simulate synthetic data that closely matches real observations, useful for optimizing experimental design. We validate its performance on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS), and synthetic TMS datasets, and provide an open-source library for Python, called hbMEP, for diverse applications.
resultsThe rectified-logistic outperformed sigmoidal functions in predictive accuracy on TMS and SCS datasets, as demonstrated through cross-validation. A mixture extension of the HB model improved robustness to outliers by further increasing its predictive accuracy. The HB model reduced threshold estimation error by up to 70% on sparse synthetic TMS data compared to non-hierarchical models. Bayesian estimation with the HB model reduced the required number of participants by at least 23% to detect a shift in threshold with 80% power, compared to frequentist testing. Empirical results on human SCS data further validated its applicability to real data.
conclusionBy improving accuracy on sparse data, our method minimizes the number of stimuli needed to probe each individual's neuromuscular parameters across multiple muscles simultaneously, thereby reducing session duration and the risk of inadvertent neuromodulation. Our approach provides a more statistically powerful and conclusive framework for inferring changes in threshold, and therefore corticospinal excitability. The hbMEP library streamlines and unifies the analysis of RCs across stimulation modalities and experimental paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.