ArticleNeuron2025
Neural mechanisms underlying the recovery of voluntary control of motoneurons after paralysis with spinal cord stimulation.
Article in Neuron, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spinal cord stimulation for upper limb motor function in people with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis: a feasibility trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Beyond Pain Relief: Motor Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury During Routine Outpatient Rehabilitation-A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Spinal cord stimulation modulates post-synaptic inhibition to improve arm neuromotor control after chronic stroke.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- A neuroprosthesis for restoring hand movement and sensation in a person with complete tetraplegia.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Spinal cord lesion characteristics and early standing ability with and without epidural stimulation.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- The optimization of neuroprosthetic interfaces relying on biophysical and surrogate digital twins.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Recovery of Dexterous Motor Control via Non-Monosynaptic Corticospinal Pathways.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Spinal cord stimulation modulates post-synaptic inhibition improving neuromotor control of arm movement in people with chronic hemiparesis post-stroke.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Transcutaneous stimulation of the cervical spinal cord facilitates motoneuron firing and improves hand-motor function after spinal cord injury.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) improves motor control after paralysis. This evidence led to the hypothesis that SCS facilitates residual supraspinal inputs to spinal motoneurons. Here, we demonstrate that this hypothesis is not supported by experimental evidence. Instead, we show that residual supraspinal inputs modulate motoneurons' membrane potential to transform subthreshold SCS pulses into suprathreshold action potentials, thereby entraining motoneuron activity to SCS. Despite this entrainment, residual supraspinal inputs can control motoneuron firing rates by modulating the number of subthreshold SCS pulses transformed into action potentials, resulting in volitional modulation of motor output for a restricted set of SCS parameters. Furthermore, we predict that residual supraspinal inhibitory drive can silence unwanted suprathreshold motoneuron activity, enlarging the functional set of SCS parameters. Finally, we demonstrate that this set of functional stimulation parameters is further restricted by lesion severity, highlighting an intrinsic limitation of SCS in cases of severe injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.