Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40974742›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2026

Multifunctional bilayer scaffold for dental pulp protection and sustained calcium hydroxide release for mineralized tissue regeneration.

Caroline Anselmi, Igor P Mendes Soares, Renan Dal-Fabbro, Sarah Chang, Ana Beatriz Gomes de Carvalho, Pedro H C Oliveira, Alexandre H Dos Reis-Prado, Carlos A de Souza Costa, Josimeri Hebling, Marco C Bottino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Caroline AnselmiDepartment of Cardiology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Morphology and Pediatric Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, Brazil.
Igor P Mendes SoaresDepartment of Cardiology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, Brazil.
Renan Dal-FabbroDepartment of Cardiology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sarah ChangDepartment of Cardiology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ana Beatriz Gomes de CarvalhoDepartment of Cardiology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, São José dos Campos, Brazil.
Pedro H C OliveiraDepartment of Cardiology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, Brazil.
Alexandre H Dos Reis-PradoDepartment of Cardiology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Minas Gerais Federal University (UFMG), School of Dentistry, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Carlos A de Souza CostaDepartment of Physiology and Pathology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, Brazil.
Josimeri HeblingDepartment of Morphology and Pediatric Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araraquara, Brazil.
Marco C BottinoDepartment of Cardiology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: mbottino@umich.edu.

Funding

Personalized Strategies for Periodontal Tissue Regeneration - A Converged Biofabrication ApproachR01DE031476 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Marco C Bottino · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE031476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injury to the mineralized tissues that protect the dental pulp can lead to pulp exposure and inflammation, necessitating the use of biologically active materials capable of preserving pulp vitality. While current biomaterials such as mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) are widely used in vital pulp therapy (VPT), their high cost, challenging handling, and lack of structural flexibility highlight the need for alternatives. Here, we introduce a multifunctional bilayer scaffold composed of a polycaprolactone (PCL) film and a PCL/poly(ethylene oxide) (PCL/PEO) blend loaded with calcium hydroxide (CH), designed to provide both cytoprotection and mineralized tissue regeneration. The scaffold features a compact PCL layer, acting as a barrier to protect the pulp from external cytotoxic agents, and a CH-loaded fibrillar PCL/PEO electrospun layer, aimed at promoting odontoblastic differentiation through sustained calcium ion release. The bilayer structure demonstrated mechanical stability and a degradation profile suitable for clinical application. The release mechanism relies on gradual fiber degradation and CH dissolution. In vitro, the fibrillar layer enhanced calcium ion release, supported dental pulp stem cell adhesion and viability, and stimulated mineralized matrix formation. The compact layer preserved cell viability even in the presence of glass ionomer cement. In vivo, the bilayer scaffold elicited a comparable inflammatory response and expression of dentinogenesis and angiogenesis markers relative to MTA, although it did not attain the same level of mineralized tissue formation. Overall, our results indicate that this multifunctional bilayer scaffold offers a cost-effective, dual-purpose alternative to current materials, with potential for further optimization of its tissue regeneration capabilities prior to clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Calcification, PhysiologicCalcium HydroxideDental PulpRegenerationTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell DifferentiationCell SurvivalDelayed-Action PreparationsHumansPolyestersPolyethylene GlycolsStem CellsBiocompatible MaterialsCalcium HydroxideDelayed-Action PreparationspolycaprolactonePolyestersPolyethylene GlycolsCalcium hydroxideDental pulpDental pulp cappingGuided tissue regenerationPolycaprolactonePolyethylene oxide–polycaprolactone copolymer

Identifiers

PMID40974742
PMCPMC13033331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.