Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40974506›Full record

Observational studyEndocrine2025

Safety of Romosozumab in women with cancer and osteoporosis at high risk of fractures.

Roberto Colle, Alberto Piasentier, Alessandro Fanti, Lucrezia Gentile, Sara Bodini, Valentina Vitale, Simona Jaafar, Maria Francesca Birtolo, Francesco Bertoldo, Gherardo Mazziotti and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Anabolics in Cancer Patients: To Use or Not to Use?Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Roberto ColleDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, , Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Alberto PiasentierDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, , Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro FantiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, , Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Lucrezia GentileDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, , Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Sara BodiniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, , Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Valentina VitaleDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, , Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Simona JaafarDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, , Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Maria Francesca BirtoloDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, , Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Francesco BertoldoDepartment of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, VR, Italy.
Gherardo MazziottiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, , Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy. gherardo.mazziotti@hunimed.eu.
Andrea G LaniaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, , Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRomosozumab is an anti-sclerostin antibody approved as a second-line therapy for post-menopausal osteoporosis complicated by fractures. The drug is contraindicated in patients with high cardiovascular risk, while safety data in patients with a history of active or previous neoplasia are still limited.

methodsThis single-center prospective observational study involved patients treated with romosozumab for at least 6 months from June 2023 to June 2025, with a cancer diagnosis prior to the start of anti-fracture therapy.

resultsOf the 131 patients treated at our center, 15% (19/131) had a history of cancer. All of them were postmenopausal women (median age 74 years, range 52–82) and had received previous treatments with bone active drugs (42% of patients had been treated with zoledronate i.v., 26% with denosumab 60 mg/6 months s.c, 21% with oral bisphosphonates, and 11% with teriparatide 20 mcg s.c per day). Among the women with cancer, 32% had breast cancer, 32% had reproductive tract tumors, 21% had hematological malignancies, 11% had cutaneous melanoma and one patient had anal cancer. Only one patient with a solid tumor had metastatic disease but was in remission after systemic treatment. All patients with solid tumors had been treated surgically, 53% (8/15) had received radiotherapy, and 33% (5/15) had received systemic treatment. 50% (2/4) of patients with hematological neoplasms had received systemic treatment, while only one patient had also undergone radiotherapy. 21% (4/19) were still undergoing active oncological treatment at the time of romosozumab therapy, while 79% (15/19) were in regular follow-up (13 patients were in remission, and 2 were managed with a wait-and-see strategy). At the follow-up, 79% of patients completed the 12-month cycle of romosozumab, while the remaining 21% were still undergoing the anti-osteoporotic treatment. During follow-up, 100% of patients showed neither progression or recurrence of oncological disease, while only one patient had a new cancer diagnosis. No cardiovascular events were reported in the study cohort.

conclusionsThe study suggests that romosozumab might be safe and well tolerated in cancer survivors, with no impact on disease progression or recurrence at least in the short term, even in patients undergoing radiation therapy and those with hematological malignancies.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBone Density Conservation AgentsFractures, BoneNeoplasmsOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOsteoporotic FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonalBone Density Conservation AgentsromosozumabCancerOsteoporosisRomosozumabSafety

Identifiers

PMID40974506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.