ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2026
Beyond compliance: evaluating AfriMEDS competencies in South African medical education.
Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Glocalizing AfriMEDS: a decolonial, Ubuntu-grounded roadmap for operationalizing global competency standards in African medical education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
South African medical education confronts systemic challenges rooted in colonial legacies, demanding transformative pedagogies that redress inequities and integrate community health through culturally responsive frameworks. This convergent mixed-methods study, guided by a transformative paradigm emphasizing ethical engagement and social justice, evaluated the implementation of the AfriMEDS framework, a local adaptation of CanMEDS incorporating community-based education (CBE) and community-oriented primary care (COPC) at the University of the Free State (UFS). Methods included curriculum mapping, document analysis, 15 educator interviews, and surveys of 71 medical interns. Document review revealed that health advocate, leader and manager, and scholar roles were minimally featured in phase guides and that existing assessment tools diverged from CanMEDS recommendations. Educator interviews identified three principal barriers: insufficient faculty development (87% of participants), resource constraints, and misaligned assessment practices. Intern surveys showed only 63% felt leadership training was adequate, 71% felt prepared for CBE, and 72% felt competent in collaboration. These findings expose critical gaps in embedding AfriMEDS competencies, particularly intrinsic roles, within undergraduate training. Our methodological framework highlights how CBE and COPC can serve as catalysts for meaningful curricular reform by fostering sustained collaboration between learners, educators, and communities. We recommend systemic reforms including decolonial pedagogical strategies, robust faculty development in cultural competency, alignment of curricula with national health priorities, and the creation of benchmarked assessment tools that reflect African healthcare contexts and community needs. Failure to implement these reforms risks perpetuating inequity and undermining South Africa’s health transformation agenda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.