ReviewCurrent oncology reports2025
Emerging Biomarkers to Predict Immunotherapy Response in Breast Cancer.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of PD-L1 combined positive score with disease control and response kinetics with first-line pembrolizumab-based therapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: results from routine clinical practice in Poland.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a cuproptosis-related lncRNA signature for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy response in breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of TCGA data.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewSummarize and update the most recent evidence on biomarkers of immunotherapy response in breast cancer including currently used and investigational markers. RECENT
findingsCurrently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved only for patients with triple negative breast cancers (TNBC); however, ICIs are actively investigated in all breast cancer subtypes. Because only a subset of patients derives clinical benefit from ICIs, predictive biomarkers are crucial for rational treatment selection. In metastatic TNBC, PD-L1 positivity of the tumor and/or immune cells defines the patient population eligible for ICI therapy; however, it is an imperfect biomarker, and its expression does not always correlate with ICI benefit. Other biomarkers such as high tumor mutation burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI)-High status also serve as tumor-agnostic indicators of ICI response. In early-stage TNBC, ICI benefit appears to be independent of PD-L1 expression. Higher tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are generally associated with improved ICI responses. Gene expression signatures are emerging as novel predictors of ICI response. The indications for ICIs in breast cancer are rapidly increasing. Currently available biomarkers fall short of accurately predicting which patients will benefit most from ICI therapy, highlighting the need for further research for more rational selection of patients to maximize efficacy and limit toxicities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40974489What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.