ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2025
Angiotensin receptor blocker and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use and survival in gastric cancer patients: a Finnish nationwide cohort study.
Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been increasingly recognized to be associated with carcinogenesis and cancer progression. There is extensive preclinical evidence suggesting the benefits of RAS-inhibiting drugs, such as angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), in preventing the progression of gastric cancer (GC). However, clinical evidence supporting the positive effects of ARBs and ACEIs on GC prognosis is currently limited. The purpose of this study is to investigate their effects in a Finnish cohort.
methodsThis is a retrospective national cohort study, where cancer patient registry data were linked to prescription purchase records for ARBs and ACEIs. The effect of ARB/ACEI in the post-diagnostic period on overall mortality was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Disease-specific mortality associations were evaluated with the Fine and Gray model.
resultsWe included 2246 histologically confirmed GC patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2016. Follow-up continued until the end of 2023. In the main analysis, a protective effect of ARB use was associated with a significant reduction in overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.94, p = 0.007). Furthermore, the effect was greater for those with higher ARB dosage. A similar finding was not observed with ACEI use. For disease-specific survival, both ARB and ACEI use had a significant protective effect (adjusted HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.90 p = 0.002 and adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.93, P = 0.007, respectively).
conclusionsOur study adds to the evidence that ARB use might have a beneficial impact on survival among GC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.