ArticleMolecular biology reports2025
Screening and validation of reference genes of Gynostemma pentaphyllum with different tissues and under different treatment conditions by RT-qPCR analysis.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGynostemma pentaphyllum is an economically valuable medicinal and edible plant. The accumulation of secondary metabolites of G. pentaphyllum exhibits tissue-specificity and is influenced by abiotic factors. However, there is currently little known regarding the molecular mechanisms involved. RT-qPCR provides a clear understanding of the gene expression changes in plants under developmental conditions. This study aimed to identify and validate stable reference genes for use in RT-qPCR studies across different tissues and stress conditions in G. pentaphyllum. METHODS AND
resultsThe 12 candidate reference genes (CYP, DnaJ, EF-1α, EIF3, EIF5A2, GAPDH, H1, MUB, RPL, UBC, α-TUB and β-TUB) were selected for measurement by RT-qPCR with different tissues (leaves, petioles, stems, roots, flowers, fruits and tendrils), and abiotic stresses (Cd, MeJA and Cd + MeJA treatment). The geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper and RefFinder analysis were used to evaluate stability value of reference gene. The comprehensive ranking of evaluation showed that EF-1α was the most suitable reference gene for different tissues and UBC were the most stable reference genes for Cd stress and MeJA treatments tested. However, CYP showed the lowest stability under different experimental conditions. Furthermore, GpFPS and GpSE were used to verify the applicability of the selected reference genes.
conclusionThis study provides the groundwork for precise gene expression measurements in G. pentaphyllum, enabling accurate assessment of target gene expression under different experimental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40974476What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.