ArticleEnvironmental toxicology2026
Ecotoxicological Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Butylparaben in Edaphic Organisms Using Multiple Biomarkers.
Article in Environmental toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ecotoxicological Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Butylparaben in Edaphic Organisms Using Multiple Biomarkers.Environmental toxicology · 2026Article
- Cellular and Systemic Toxicity Induced by Sunscreen and Paraben Mixtures and the Implications for Root Development in Cultivated Plants.Journal of toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Butylparaben (BuP) recurrently contaminates soils worldwide, mainly by incorporating sewage sludge into cultivated areas, using wastewater in irrigation, and leaching contaminated soils. However, there are few studies on the ecotoxicological effects of this paraben on edaphic organisms. The ecotoxicity of BuP was evaluated in seeds of Daucus carota , Allium cepa , and Cucumis sativus , in the roots of A. cepa bulbs, and in Eisenia fetida earthworms, at concentrations of 10, 50, 100, and 500 ng/L. In root meristems, the four concentrations of BuP induced lipid peroxidation and raised the levels of superoxide radicals, which triggered inhibition of cell division and mitotic spindle alteration, significantly reducing the growth of roots in seeds and bulbs. In animals, BuP at 10, 50, 100, and 500 ng/L caused 80%, 80%, 70%, and 90% evasion of earthworms from artificial soil, respectively. In addition, this paraben did not cause mortality in earthworms after 14 days of exposure. However, all concentrations increased the production of superoxide and hydroxyl radicals in cells and caused lipid peroxidation. Thus, increased exposure to this compound can affect the ecological functions negatively and/or cause the death of these animals. Therefore, recurrent contamination with BuP can negatively impact soil quality, posing a risk to agricultural productivity and the environment. This study is a pioneer in the ecotoxicological evaluation of BuP in plants at environmentally relevant concentrations and in the behavioral and oxidative stress study in earthworms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.