Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40974272›Full record

ArticleAutism : the international journal of research and practice2026

Understanding eye care access for autistic adults and families: A convergent mixed-methods study.

Chris Edwards, Abigail Ma Love, Ru Ying Cai, Paul Constable, Daniel C Love, Ketan Parmar, Emma Gowen, Vicki Gibbs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chris EdwardsAspect (Autism Spectrum Australia), Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0617-674X
Abigail Ma LoveAspect (Autism Spectrum Australia), Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6647-9814
Ru Ying CaiAspect (Autism Spectrum Australia), Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2954-0495
Paul ConstableFlinders University, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3994-1700
Daniel C LoveUniversity of Cincinnati, USA.
Ketan ParmarThe University of Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3001-3462
Emma GowenThe University of Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4788-4280
Vicki GibbsAspect (Autism Spectrum Australia), Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5058-5164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autistic people face persistent barriers to accessing healthcare, yet little is known about their experiences receiving eye care, despite elevated rates of vision conditions. This convergent mixed-methods study explored the eye care experiences of 127 autistic adults and 69 parents of autistic children living in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. Through an online survey incorporating both structured and open-ended items, we examined access patterns, perceived barriers and enablers, and unmet needs. Quantitative data revealed widespread challenges, including sensory discomfort, communication difficulties, and financial costs, while qualitative responses foregrounded how provider interaction, clinical pacing, and environmental conditions shaped overall experience. Although participants valued clearer communication and sensory-informed adjustments, these were described as insufficient in the face of structural barriers such as affordability and inaccessible service locations. These findings align with emerging models of autism-informed healthcare that advocate for systemic, rather than ad hoc, approaches to accessibility. Our results underscore the need for proactive, cross-sector solutions developed in partnership with autistic people, which embed neurodiversity-affirming principles into eye care design, delivery, and policy. Addressing these inequities is both an ethical and practical imperative if we are to ensure that eye care services are inclusive, sustainable, and responsive to diverse ways of being.Lay abstractAutistic people often face barriers when using healthcare services, but little is known about their experiences with eye care. This is important because autistic people are more likely to have vision problems like needing glasses, having a lazy eye, or having trouble with how their eyes work together. In this study, we asked 127 autistic adults and 69 parents of autistic children in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand about their experiences receiving eye care. People completed an online survey that included multiple-choice questions and space to describe their experiences in their own words. Many participants said that eye care could be stressful or confusing. Common challenges included unclear instructions, bright lights, noisy environments, feeling rushed, and staff not understanding autism. Some people avoided going to eye care professionals altogether because they could not afford glasses or found the environment too overwhelming. Participants said that small changes like using plain language, giving more time, and creating a calm environment helped make care more accessible. However, these small changes were not always enough, especially when services were too expensive or hard to get to. To improve access to eye care, changes need to happen at all levels, including how clinics are designed and how staff are trained. These changes should be made together with autistic people to make sure that services meet their needs and feel respectful and welcoming. This study shows the need to redesign eye care so that it works better for autistic people and their families.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderHealth Services AccessibilityVision DisordersAdolescentAdultAustraliaChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandParentsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultautismautism-friendlyclinical/diagnoseseye carehealthcarevision

Identifiers

PMID40974272
PMCPMC12717288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.