Psychometric Properties of the Everyday Ageism Scale: Results from the Experiences of Aging in Society Project.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Response to "Sample Representativeness and Test-Retest Reliability in the Japanese Everyday Ageism Scale: A Methodological Reconsideration".Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2026
   Article
2. Development and Psychometric Validation of the Japanese Version of the Everyday Ageism Scale (EAS-J) Among Older Adults.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2026
   Article
3. Older adults' report of fight-or-flight and other acute stress responses to ageism and linkages to health.Aging & mental health · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as