ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2025
Magnitude of persistent poverty and cervical cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, and mortality.
Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Socioeconomically disadvantaged counties exhibit higher cervical cancer incidence and poorer survival. However, the specific impact of the magnitude of persistent poverty on these outcomes remains largely unexamined. Using national cancer registry data, we observed that women living in persistent poverty counties who have experienced extreme poverty (≥40% poverty) have more than 1.5 times higher cervical cancer incidence and twice the mortality rate as women who lived in nonpersistent poverty counties. Furthermore, stage-specific incidence was consistently higher in persistent poverty counties across localized, regional, and distant diagnoses. Five-year mortality for localized cervical cancer diagnoses was nearly twice as high in extreme poverty counties (11% vs 6%, 2-sided P = .03). These findings highlight substantial disparities in cervical cancer outcomes associated with increasing magnitude of persistent poverty and underscore the need for targeted interventions in economically vulnerable communities to reduce disparities and achieve cervical cancer elimination goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.