ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026
Characteristics of drug-related deaths among individuals identified as LGBTQ+ in the United Kingdom, 1997-2024.
Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characteristics of drug-related deaths among individuals identified as LGBTQ+ in the United Kingdom, 1997-2024.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsIndividuals from sexual and gender minorities (LGBTQ+) are understudied and at increased and differential risk of experiencing drug-related harms when compared with the general population. We aimed to determine the case characteristics, circumstances of death and type of implicated drugs among LGBTQ+ individuals dying due to drug-related causes. We also aimed to assess any differences between deaths occurring in the context of sexualised vs. non-sexualised drug use.
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingCoronial records submitted to the National Programme on Substance Use Mortality (NPSUM) in the United Kingdom (UK), 1997-2024. CASES: Decedents identified as LGBTQ+. MEASUREMENTS: Information was available on decedent sociodemographics, characteristics of death and drugs implicated in death.
findingsA total of 83 decedents were identified as LGBTQ+. Forty-six were identified as cis men (55.4%), four as trans men (4.8%), two as cis women (2.4%) and 31 as trans women (37.3%). Forty-five were identified as gay, including 44 gay men (53.0%) and one gay woman (1.2%), with three identified as bisexual (3.6%). Decedents were predominantly of White ethnicity (n = 68, 81.9%) with a mean age of 38.2 years (standard deviation 12.1; range 16-84). Overall, 16 (19.8%) cases were deemed intentional. Poisoning was the main disease or condition that was certified as the underlying cause of death (n = 46, 55.4%). The median number of drugs implicated in death was 2 [Interquartile range (IQR) 1, 2] with multiple drug toxicity implicated in the majority of cases (n = 42, 50.6%). The two most common drug groups implicated in death were opioids (n = 31, 37.3%) and gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and related compounds (n = 14, 16.9%). Death occurred in the context of sexualised drug use in 21 cases (25.3%). There were statistically significantly fewer cases in which any opioid (33.9% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.009) or any benzodiazepine (21.0% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.02) were implicated when compared with cases of non-sexualised drug use.
conclusionsOver the last three decades in the United Kingdom there have been consistent numbers of drug-related deaths each year in which individuals were identified as LGBTQ+, results likely representing conservative estimates. A minority of drug-related deaths occurred in the context of sexualised drug use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.