ArticleBehavioral sciences & the law
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Violence Risk Assessment: Emerging Technology and the Ethics of the Inevitable.
Article in Behavioral sciences & the law. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Generative Artificial Intelligence in Violence Risk Assessment: Emerging Technology and the Ethics of the Inevitable.Behavioral sciences & the lawArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) have stimulated considerable excitement and discussion regarding the potential impacts on people's lives and work. In particular, proposed and realized applications of generative AI have appeared across multiple industries and domains, including at the intersection of behavioral science and the law. This manuscript presents an ethical analysis of applications of generative AI to violence risk assessment, guided by the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence and non-maleficence, and justice. The authors argue that generative AI, although capable of producing novel content, is nonetheless vulnerable to ethical problems, including through its exposure to biased training data. Issues such as limited transparency in decision making and the potential for the perpetuation and exacerbation of racial disparities are discussed. The authors recommend that professionals approach generative AI with due caution, as they would with any novel or emerging risk assessment approach, and suggest continued evaluation and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.