ArticleCancer medicine2025
Prognosis and Failure Patterns of 11q13 Amplified Local Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- FGF/FGFR Alteration Type as a Candidate Enrichment Biomarker for Gunagratinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis of Two Early-Phase Trials.Targeted oncology · 2026Trial
- Prognosis and Failure Patterns of 11q13 Amplified Local Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmplification of 11q13 (FGF3/4/19, CCND1) is frequently observed in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, there is a lack of research investigating 11q13 amplification as a prognostic marker for patients with locally advanced (LA) HNSCC who undergo postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included consecutive patients of LA-HNSCC who underwent radical surgical resection and PORT. The 11q13 amplification was tested by next-generation Sequencing (NGS) or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match the amplification and wild-type groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. Recurrence patterns and phenotypes in the amplification group were also assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using R software, with a p-value of < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
resultsA total of 70 patients were included (35 in the 11q13 amplification group and 35 in the wild-type group). Patients with 11q13 amplification exhibited significantly worse disease-free survival (DFS) (3-year DFS: 21.0% vs. 52.6%; p < 0.0019) and overall survival (OS) (3-year OS: 46.4% vs. 66.7%; p = 0.032) compared to wild-type patients. The recurrence pattern in the amplification group showed an approximately equal proportion of local-regional recurrence (LRR) and distant metastases (DM). The LRR predominantly occurred within the 60 Gy radiation field. Multivariate analyses revealed that 11q13 amplification significantly associated with worse DFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.007).
conclusionLA-HNSCC patients with 11q13 amplification exhibited significantly worse DFS and OS compared to wild-type patients. The recurrence pattern in the 11q13 amplification group was primarily characterized by in-field recurrences within the 60 Gy dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.