ArticleChemical senses2025
Congruency of multisensory olfactory stimuli.
Article in Chemical senses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating olfactory assessments in consciousness disorders: methodologies and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We perceive our environment via different sensory channels in a multisensory fashion. During multisensory integration, these channels can enhance or hinder each other depending on congruency. Here, we aimed to investigate how the congruency of gustatory and visual costimulation alter the perception of olfactory stimuli. We hypothesized that congruent costimulation enhances the perception of likeness, i.e. how well stimuli match a label, compared with no and to incongruent costimulation. We also aimed to quantify the effect of gustatory and visual costimulation. We tested 48 healthy young participants. We used retronasal olfactory stimuli (strawberry, cheese, lemon, and coffee) (i) alone or with congruent/incongruent costimulation ((ii) with congruent gustatory (sweet, salty, sour, and bitter), (iii) with congruent visual (images of strawberry, cheese, lemon, and coffee), (iv) with congruent visual and gustatory, (v) with congruent visual and incongruent gustatory, (vi) with congruent gustatory and incongruent visual, (vii) with incongruent visual and gustatory costimulations). Olfactory and gustatory stimuli were presented by means of droplets on the tongue, i.e. olfactory stimuli were delivered retronasally, while visual stimuli were presented on a computer screen. We asked participants to evaluate the solutions' likeness to the respective olfactory label on visual analog scales. We observed a significant effect of congruency on likeness (P < 0.001). Gustatory costimulation had a significantly stronger effect than visual costimulation (P = 0.02). Congruent costimulation enhances the evaluation of likeness while incongruent costimulation reduces it, with gustatory costimulation having significantly stronger effects than visual costimulation. This could be useful in multisensory olfactory training paradigms for olfactory loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.