ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
Functional Determinants and Evolutionary Consequences of Pleiotropy in Complex and Mendelian Traits.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotyping and hierarchical clustering in genetically unresolved DSD identifies distinct multisystem clinical subgroups-a DSDgene study.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- Gene-level complexity explains genome-wide variation in the distribution of fitness effects.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genetic Determinants of T-Cell Homeostasis in Critical Illness: An Exploratory Analysis of Immune Gene Variants and TREC Dynamics.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Dissecting Alzheimer's disease heterogeneity by cross-trait polygenic prediction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The Human Pleiotropic Map of GWAS Associations and Therapeutic Implications.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- The Evolutionary Flexibility of the Drosophila Circadian Clock: Network Constraints or Adaptive Freedom?Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pleiotropy, a phenomenon of multiple phenotypic effects of the same genetic alteration, is one of the most important features of genotype-to-phenotype networks. Over the last century, biologists have actively debated the prevalence, mechanisms, and consequences of pleiotropy. In this work, we employed data on genotype-to-phenotype associations from the Human Phenotype Ontology and Mouse Genome Database, as well as genome-wide associations from the UK Biobank and FinnGen cohorts to investigate the similarities and dissimilarities in the patterns of pleiotropy between species and different trait types (i.e. Mendelian traits and complex traits). We found that the pleiotropic effects of genes correlate well between species but have a much weaker correlation when comparing different types of traits for the same species. In all cases, however, highly pleiotropic genes possessed a common set of features, such as broad expression across tissues, involvement in many biological processes, or a high number of protein-protein interactions of the respective gene products. Furthermore, we observed a universal tendency of highly pleiotropic genes to be under greater negative selection pressure compared to other groups of genes, including genes essential for cell growth and development. Besides, highly pleiotropic genes also show a significant enrichment of recent positive selection signals. Taken together, our results pinpoint a common mechanism underlying pleiotropic effects in different trait domains and suggest that high degree of pleiotropy plays a role in adaptation, despite imposing additional constraint on genetic variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.