Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40974012›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2026

Staging Alzheimer's disease through amyloid and tau PET.

Derek R Johnson, Heather J Wiste, Val Lowe, Christopher G Schwarz, David S Knopman, Prashanthi Vemuri, Kejal Kantarci, Bradley F Boeve, Jonathan Graff-Radford, Petrice M Cogswell and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Derek R JohnsonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4217-5517
Heather J WisteDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Val LoweDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Christopher G SchwarzDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1466-8357
David S KnopmanDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6544-066X
Prashanthi VemuriDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4286-0589
Kejal KantarciDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8001-2081
Bradley F BoeveDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4153-8187
Jonathan Graff-RadfordDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2770-0691
Petrice M CogswellDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8128-4476
Matthew C SenjemDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Terry M TherneauDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Michael E GriswoldDepartment of Data Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.
Mingzhao HuDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Ronald C PetersenDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Clifford R JackDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7916-622X

Funding

Rochester Epidemiology ProjectR01AG034676 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A, ST SAUVER, JENNIFER LYNN · 2010 to 2019
$9.5M
Investigating Resistance and Resilience Mechanisms in Alzheimer’s DiseaseR01AG056366 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PRASHANTHI VEMURI · 2017 to 2026
$7.0M
Disease pathways in the population determined by amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration imaging biomarkersR37AG011378 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CLIFFORD R. JACK · 2018 to 2026
$6.8M
Development, Validation, and Application of an Imaging based CVD ScaleR01NS097495 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VEMURI, PRASHANTHI · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeJohnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & DevelopmentNIA NIH HHS R37 AG011378NIBIB NIH HHSNIH HHS R01 AG034676NIH HHS R01 AG056366NIH HHS R01 NS097495NIH HHS R37 AG011378NIH HHS RO1 AG041851NIH HHS U01 AG06786Northern California Institute for Research and EducationUniversity of Southern California
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A workgroup assembled by the Alzheimer's Association recently described a conceptual framework for Alzheimer's disease biological staging based on amyloid and tau PET imaging. However, specific tau PET cut points were left to be determined, a step necessary prior to clinical application. We sought to operationalize and evaluate Alzheimer's disease biological staging by identifying meaningful tau PET cut points to define the four biological stages in a well-characterized participant cohort and describe the features of individuals placed into the different biological stages. The primary analysis included 896 participants in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging or the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's Disease Research Center longitudinal cohorts. A validation cohort consisted of 328 participants in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Both cognitively normal and impaired individuals with positive amyloid PET and evaluable tau PET imaging were included. Tau PET cut points were identified with Gaussian mixture models to characterize Alzheimer's disease biological stage in study participants with different clinical diagnoses and objective degrees of cognitive impairment as measured by Mini-Mental State Examination. A tau PET cut point in the medial temporal region and two cut points in the temporoparietal region were identified to produce, collectively, the four Alzheimer's disease biological stages described in the revised criteria. Increasing stage was associated with greater likelihood of mild cognitive impairment and dementia diagnosis and worsening cognitive performance on Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes, a result that was reproduced in the independent Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort. This study provided empirical validation for the concept of using amyloid PET and tau PET to separate subjects with biomarker-proven Alzheimer's disease into four biological stages with distinct characteristics.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesPositron-Emission Tomographytau ProteinsAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive DysfunctionCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedAmyloid beta-Peptidestau Proteinsbiomarkerdementianeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID40974012
PMCPMC13016809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.