Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40973970›Full record

SynthesisInflammatory bowel diseases2026

Immunomodulators and Advanced Therapies for Induction of Remission in Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Vasiliki Sinopoulou, Morris Gordon, Shiyao Liu, Daniel Arruda Navarro Albuquerque, Aderonke Ajiboye, Sudheer Kumar Vuyyuru, Shellie Radford, Gordon Moran

Abstract readNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Local and circulating cytotoxic CD4medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Network meta-analyses in IBD: pitfalls and promise for clinicians.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vasiliki SinopoulouSchool of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2831-9406
Morris GordonSchool of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1216-5158
Shiyao LiuSchool of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Daniel Arruda Navarro AlbuquerqueSchool of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1539-8798
Aderonke AjiboyeSchool of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5989-9522
Sudheer Kumar VuyyuruFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8281-3237
Shellie RadfordFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2226-0810
Gordon MoranFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8906-6908

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious reviews for Crohn's disease (CD) treatment have rarely considered advanced and immunomodulator medical therapies together. Our aim was to compare all therapies for efficacy and safety in induction of remission.

methodsWe searched databases up to June 2025. Our outcomes were clinical remission and response, endoscopic remission, and safety outcomes. We performed network meta-analyses and estimated risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs. We used GRADE to assess certainty of results, and surface under the cumulative ranking curve for ranking treatments.

resultsA total of 79 RCTs with 20 724 participants were included. Interventions ranged from 2 to 30 weeks. There was moderate GRADE certainty of effectiveness over placebo for clinical remission for combination of adalimumab with thiopurines (RR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.99-4.14; RD (Risk difference)  = 35.3%; NNT (Number needed to treat) = 3, large magnitude), guselkumab (RR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.95-3.21; RD = 28.4%; NNT = 4, moderate magnitude, adalimumab (RR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.84-3.29; RD = 27.6% NNT = 4, moderate magnitude), combination of infliximab with thiopurines (RR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.71-3.44; RD = 27%; NNT = 4, moderate magnitude), and ustekinumab (RR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.69-2.46; RD = 19.6% NNT = 5, small magnitude). For endoscopic remission, there was moderate GRADE certainty of effectiveness for risankizumab (RR, 3.48; 95% CI, 2.18-5.58; RD = 17.4%, moderate magnitude). The certainty on safety varied, but treatments appear generally safe in the short term.

conclusionCombination of anti-tumor necrosis factors (anti-TNFs) and immunomodulators followed by anti-TNF monotherapy had large effect size with moderate certainty for the induction of clinical remission. More novel therapies appear to have similar effect sizes but with increased imprecision of the estimates.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseImmunologic FactorsImmunomodulating AgentsAdalimumabDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRemission InductionAdalimumabImmunologic FactorsImmunomodulating Agentsevidence synthesisgastroenterologyinflammatory bowel disease

Identifiers

PMID40973970
PMCPMC12759050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.