ArticleBMC cancer2025
Highly-accurate prediction of colorectal cancer through low abundance uncultivated genomes recovered using metagenomic co-assembly and binning approach.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent microbiome studies have established the association between the composition of gut microbiota and various diseases. Since 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing may suffer from problems such as lower taxonomic resolution or limited sensitivity, more and more studies embraced whole-metagenome approach, which has the potential of sequencing everything in the target microbiome, to conduct microbial association analysis. However, species profiling, which is the most popular analysis technique for whole-metagenome analysis, cannot detect uncultivated species. Since uncultivated species may also be indispensable in the gut environments, it is crucial to identify those uncultivated species and evaluate their importance in discerning disease samples from healthy ones.
resultsAfter conducting de novo co-assembly and genome binning procedures on two colorectal cancer (CRC) cohorts, in which one of them was from the Asian population while the other was from the Caucasian population, we identified that the Asian and Caucasian cohorts shared a significant amount of microbial species in their microbiota. In addition we found that low abundance genomes may be more important in classifying disease and healthy metagenomes. By sorting the genomes based on their random forest importance scores in differentiating disease and healthy samples and cumulatively evaluating the genome subsets in predicting CRC status, we identified dozens of "important" genomes for each of the cohorts that were able to predict CRC with very high accuracy (0.90 and 0.98 AUROC for the Asian and Caucasian cohorts respectively). Uncultivated species were also identified among the selected genomes, highlighting the importance of including the uncultivated species in order to build better disease prediction models and evaluate the roles of the uncultivated species in the disease formation or progression. Finally we found that the "important" species for both cohorts did not overlap with each other, hinting that the species highly associated with CRC disease may be different between the Eastern and Western populations.
conclusionIn this study we demonstrated the importance of recovering and analyzing low abundance uncultivated species to identify their associations with colorectal cancer. We hope this work shed new light on a more comprehensive understanding of how our gut microbes are correlated with diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.