ReviewJournal of cheminformatics2025
A comprehensive landscape of AI applications in broad-spectrum drug interaction prediction: a systematic review.
Review in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: "A comprehensive landscape of AI applications in broad-spectrum drug interaction prediction: a systematic review" (Marzouk et al., 2025).Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Early prediction and risk assessment of adverse drug combinations using ensemble learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI in Drug Discovery: Clinical Failures, Regulatory Reality, and the Validation Crisis Behind the Hype.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ginger Bioactives as Multi-Target Therapeutics: Mechanisms, Delivery Innovation, and Human Health Impact.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Towards precision medicine in Tourette syndrome: a perspective on AI-driven predictive modelling and personalised care.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Review
- Closing the loop: human-augmented, mechanistically enhanced AI for proactive management of drug-drug interactions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Decoding psychotropic-induced metabolic disturbances: gut-brain axis, multi-omics, and nutrition-lifestyle integration.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In drug development, managing interactions such as drug-drug, drug-disease, and drug-nutrient is critical for ensuring the safety and efficacy of pharmacological treatments. These interactions often overlap, forming a complex, interconnected landscape that necessitates accurate prediction to improve patient outcomes and support evidence-based care. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), powered by large-scale datasets (e.g., DrugBank, TWOSIDES, SIDER), have significantly enhanced interaction prediction. Machine learning, deep learning, and graph-based models show great promise, but challenges persist, including data imbalance, noisy sources, Limited explainability, and underrepresentation of certain types of interactions. This systematic review of 147 studies (2018-2024) is the first to comprehensively map AI applications across major interaction types. We present a detailed taxonomy of models and datasets, emphasizing the growing roles of large language models and knowledge graphs in overcoming key limitations. Their integration-alongside explainable AI tools-enhances transparency, paving the way for AI-driven systems that proactively mitigate adverse interactions. By identifying the most promising approaches and critical research gaps, this review lays the groundwork for advancing more robust, interpretable, and personalized models for drug interaction prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.