Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40973925›Full record

ReviewPrenatal diagnosis2025

Prenatal Metabolomics Analysis and Fetal Congenital Anomalies and Genetic Conditions: A Review of Current Literature.

Sarah Araji, Onur Turkoglu, Mohamad Ali Maktabi, Tracy Ashby, Ignatia B Van den Veyver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Prenatal diagnosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah ArajiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9064-8526
Onur TurkogluDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mohamad Ali MaktabiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7664-5700
Tracy AshbyTexas Medical Center Library, Houston, Texas, USA.
Ignatia B Van den VeyverDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0651-5924

Funding

Research Vision and Duncan NRI at Texas Children's Hospital
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetal congenital anomalies and genetic disorders complicate 3%-5% of pregnancies and can have a significant impact on pregnancy outcomes. Precise and individualized prenatal diagnosis is crucial for effective counseling and management. The identification of new biomarkers holds promise for enhancing prenatal screening, diagnosis, and prognostic counseling in affected pregnancies. Recently, metabolomics has emerged as a potential adjunct in the interpretation of genetic variants identified through genome-wide sequencing for rare genetic conditions. To assess the potential of metabolomic profiling as a functional assay capable of providing deeper insights into the pathological processes and genetic findings associated with prenatal congenital anomalies, we conducted a comprehensive literature review. We searched MEDLINE (OVID), Embase (Elsevier), Web of Science (Clarivate), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) for relevant studies published through March 2025, focusing on metabolomic profiling of pregnancies affected by fetal structural anomalies or genetic disorders. While metabolomics is a promising tool in prenatal screening and diagnosis, its integration into clinical practice remains limited.

Indexed as

Congenital AbnormalitiesGenetic Diseases, InbornMetabolomicsPrenatal DiagnosisFemaleFetusHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40973925
PMCPMC12611541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.