ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2025
MRI annotation using an inversion-based preprocessing for CT model adaptation.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnnotating new classes in MRI images is time-consuming. Refining presegmented structures can accelerate this process. Many target classes lacking in MRI are supported by computed tomography (CT) models, but translating MRI to synthetic CT images is challenging. We demonstrate that CT segmentation models can create accurate MRI presegmentations, with or without image inversion. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively investigated the performance of two CT-trained models on MRI images: a general multiclass model (TotalSegmentator); and a specialized renal tumor model trained in-house. Both models were applied to 100 T1-weighted (T1w) and 100 T2-weighted fat-saturated (T2wfs) MRI sequences from 100 patients (50 male). Segmentation quality was evaluated on both raw and intensity-inverted sequences using Dice similarity coefficients (DSC), with reference annotations comprising manual kidney tumor annotations and automatically generated segmentations for 24 abdominal structures.
resultsSegmentation quality varied by MRI sequence and anatomical structure. Both models accurately segmented kidneys in T2wfs sequences without preprocessing (TotalSegmentator DSC 0.60), but TotalSegmentator failed to segment blood vessels and muscles. In T1w sequences, intensity inversion significantly improved TotalSegmentator performance, increasing the mean DSC across 24 structures from 0.04 to 0.56 (p < 0.001). Kidney tumor segmentation demonstrated poor performance in T2wfs sequences regardless of preprocessing. In T1w sequences, inversion improved tumor segmentation DSC from 0.04 to 0.42 (p < 0.001).
conclusionCT-trained models can generalize to MRI when supported by image augmentation. Inversion preprocessing enabled segmentation of renal cell carcinoma in T1w MRI using a CT-trained model. CT models might be transferable to the MRI domain. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: CT-trained artificial intelligence models can be adapted for MRI segmentation using simple preprocessing, potentially reducing manual annotation efforts and accelerating the development of AI-assisted tools for MRI analysis in research and future clinical practice. KEY POINTS: CT segmentation models can create presegmentations for many structures in MRI scans. T1w MRI scans require an additional inversion step before segmenting with a CT model. Results were consistent for a large multiclass model (i.e., TotalSegmentator) and a smaller model for renal cell carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.