ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Efficacy of slow-coagulation cyclophotocoagulation after failed MicroPulse cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Slow-coagulation continuous wave cyclophotocoagulation (SC-CWCPC) is a promising treatment option for refractory glaucoma. However, its efficacy following a failed MicroPulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) procedure remains unexplored. This study evaluates the efficacy of SC-CWCPC in patients with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) after undergoing MP-TSCPC. A retrospective case series of patients with uncontrolled glaucoma who underwent SC-CWCPC following MP-TSCPC failure was conducted. All procedures were performed by a single glaucoma surgeon between January 2022 And October 2024. Patients with < 3 months follow-up were excluded. SC-CWCPC was performed using 1250-milliwatt power and 4-second applications. Surgical success was defined as IOP between 6 and 21 mmHg with a ≥ 20% reduction from baseline on topical medication, no incisional reoperation for glaucoma, and no loss of light perception vision. Eight patients (10 eyes) with a mean age of 43.75 ± 24.59 years were included. 90% (9/10) had prior Tube/Trabeculectomy procedures. Mean preoperative IOP was 26.10 ± 15.80 mmHg on 3.1 ± 1.20 antiglaucoma medications (AGM). At a mean follow up time of 10.97 ± 3.42 months, IOP decreased to 15.80 ± 5.31 mmHg (p = 0.002) with 2.30 ± 1.49 AGM (p = 0.070) with an overall success rate of 80%. One eye required Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implantation one year postoperatively while another had prolonged inflammation that resolved medically. No cases of persistent hypotony or significant visual acuity loss occurred. SC-CWCPC is an effective and safe surgical intervention in patients with refractory glaucoma following failed MP-TSCPC. The results of our study are helpful in expanding the role of the SC-CWCPC technique in the management of glaucomatous patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.