Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40973826›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2025

Next-generation T cell immunotherapies engineered with CRISPR base and prime editing: challenges and opportunities.

Karl Petri, Elvira D'Ippolito, Annette Künkele, Ulrike Köhl, Dirk H Busch, Hermann Einsele, Michael Hudecek

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karl PetriChair of Cellular Immunotherapy, Medical Clinic and Policlinic II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. petri_k@ukw.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9624-3976
Elvira D'IppolitoInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0113-6797
Annette KünkeleDepartment of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrike KöhlFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology IZI, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8159-9160
Dirk H BuschInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8713-093X
Hermann EinseleNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Site WERA, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7680-0819
Michael HudecekChair of Cellular Immunotherapy, Medical Clinic and Policlinic II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. Hudecek_M@ukw.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T cells can be reprogrammed with transgenic antigen recognition receptors, including chimeric antigen receptors and T cell receptors, to selectively recognize and kill cancer cells. Such adoptive T cell therapies are effective in patients with certain haematological cancers but challenges persist, including primary and secondary resistance, a lack of efficacy in patients with solid tumours, a narrow range of targetable antigens, and time-consuming and complex manufacturing processes. CRISPR-based genome editing is a potent strategy to enhance cellular immunotherapies. Conventional CRISPR-Cas9 systems are useful for gene editing, transgene knock-in or gene knockout but can result in undesired editing outcomes, including translocations and chromosomal truncations. Base editing and prime editing technologies constitute a new generation of CRISPR platforms and enable highly precise and programmable installation of defined nucleotide variants in primary T cells. Owing to their high precision and versatility, base editing and prime editing systems, hereafter collectively referred to as CRISPR 2.0, are advancing to become the new standard for precision-engineering of cellular immunotherapies. CRISPR 2.0 can be used to augment immune cell function, broaden the spectrum of targetable antigens and facilitate streamlined production of T cell therapies. Notably, CRISPR 2.0 is reaching clinical maturity, with multiple clinical trials of CRISPR 2.0-modified cellular therapies currently ongoing. In this Review, we discuss emerging CRISPR 2.0 technologies and their progress towards clinical translation, highlighting challenges and opportunities, and describe strategies for the use of CRISPR 2.0 to advance cellular immunotherapy for haematological malignancies and solid tumours in the future.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingImmunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsT-LymphocytesHumansReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.