Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40973757›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2025

Drivers and barriers to fish and seafood consumption in the first 1000 days of life.

M F Walker, D C Aldridge, D F Willer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M F WalkerMs Megan Walker, University of Cambridge, Department of Zoology, Cambridge, England. 24meganwalker@gmail.com.
D C AldridgeProfessor David Aldridge, University of Cambridge, Department of Zoology, Cambridge, England. da113@cam.ac.uk.
D F WillerDr David Willer, University of Cambridge, Department of Zoology, Cambridge, England. dw460@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council G116601British Ecological Society SR21/1376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first 1000 days of life - from conception through to a child's second birthday - are a critical phase in which dietary deficiencies can have long-term detrimental consequences on health. Fish and seafood consumption can play a pivotal role in delivering high-quality nutrition, with the potential to provide essential nutrients such as omega-3 fatty acids, iodine, and vitamin D. These nutrients are crucial for supporting early development and can be challenging to obtain in optimal amounts. However, in the UK, fish and seafood consumption is well below recommended guidelines. Hence, this study aimed to identify the key drivers of and barriers to consumption. Data were collected using an online survey distributed through email, Facebook, LinkedIn, and UK nursery chains, targeting women, parents, and guardians supporting the first 1000 days of life in the UK. Responses were filtered for relevancy, with non-eligible participants excluded. 175 participants were included in the cohort for analysis. The analysis sought to investigate the attitudes, understanding, and motivations of participants towards fish and seafood. We reveal that mothers would like themselves and their children to eat more fish and seafood, primarily for health reasons, but that health concerns and unclear guidelines are acting as the leading hurdle to change. We suggest that there is a need for clearer guidelines and more effective information dissemination for those supporting the first 1000 days of life.

Identifiers

PMID40973757
PMCPMC12449445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.